Saturday, March 28, 2009

“Corrido” por falla en juzgado

http://www.laprensa.com.ni/archivo/2009/marzo/28/noticias/nacionales/319456.shtml


Abogado se queja de gestión de despacho judicial
Eduardo Cruz Sánchez
nacionales@laprensa.com.ni
publicidad

Millonaria demanda
La demanda que realizaba el abogado Carlos Arroyo, a favor de Francisco Urcuyo Maliaños, Presidente de Nicaragua por dos días, es contra un Citibank que operó en el país antes del triunfo de la Revolución sandinista.
Urcuyo Maliaños depositó en ese banco 375 mil córdobas, pero ahora su hijo, Francisco Urcuyo Muñoz, pide al banco el equivalente de un millón 221 mil 428.49 córdobas, más los intereses, que en dólares ascienden a más de tres millones 218 mil 503, por los casi 30 años que han transcurrido desde que se hizo el depósito.
El abogado Carlos Arroyo Ugarte se quejó de que en el Juzgado Quinto Distrito de lo Civil de Managua nunca le dieron trámite a una demanda que presentó a favor del ex presidente de la República, Francisco Urcuyo Maliaños (q.e.p.d.), por lo que su cliente, hijo del ex mandatario, lo “despidió”.
Arroyo dijo que por las fallas que existen en el nuevo Modelo de Gestión de Despacho Judicial en los Juzgados de Managua, las causas nunca avanzan y responsabilizó a la oficina de Tramitación de los Juzgados de Managua.
También pidió al Juzgado Quinto Distrito de lo Civil se aplique el artículo 95 de la Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial, el cual establece que el retardo injustificado para que un juez resuelva produce responsabilidad. El abogado también acusaría por el delito de retardo malicioso, según el artículo 465 del Código Penal vigente.
Arroyo representaba al ex presidente Urcuyo Maliaños, ya fallecido, en la causa contra un banco extranjero, en el cual en mayo de 1979 el ex mandatario depositó 375 mil córdobas, dinero que ahora su hijo Francisco Urcuyo Muñoz intenta recuperar porque nunca le fue confiscado a su padre, según consta en documentos oficiales.
Según la página web del Poder Judicial, la causa en cuestión está a cargo del juez Luis Miguel Benavides.
OCHO ESCRITOS
Arroyo explicó que presentó ocho escritos ante el Juzgado Quinto Distrito de lo Civil, para que la causa avanzara, pero nunca hubo una resolución judicial en respuesta a sus pedidos.
La única respuesta que recibió del Juzgado Quinto Distrito de lo Civil es una notificación en la que confunden las identidades del demandante y de los demandados, indicó Arroyo.
Francisco Urcuyo Muñoz habría prescindido de los servicios de Arroyo y habría puesto en su lugar al abogado Víctor Grijalba Llanes, según manifestó Arroyo y así consta en la página web del Poder Judicial.
Arroyo dijo sentirse muy perjudicado con la situación, porque ya tenía el trabajo avanzado y ahora lo pierde todo no por negligencia de él, sino porque en el Juzgado Quinto Distrito de lo Civil de Managua nunca le proveyeron, causando que su cliente buscara otro abogado.

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Dignity

Dignity is a term used in moral, ethical, and political discussions to signify that a being has an innate right to respect and ethical treatment. It is an extension of enlightenment-era beliefs that individuals have God-given, inviolable rights, and thus is closely related to concepts like virtue, respect, self-respect, autonomy, human rights, and enlightened reason. Dignity is generally proscriptive and cautionary: in politics it is usually synonymous to 'human dignity', and is used to critique the treatment of oppressed and vulnerable groups and peoples, though in some case has been extended to apply to cultures and sub-cultures, religious beliefs and ideals, animals used for food or research, and even plants. In more colloquial settings it is used to suggest that someone is not receiving a proper degree of respect, or even that they are failing to treat themselves with proper self-respect.


I know that there are worst things happening around the world and missery is touching the lives of many people at the moment.
As we all tighten our belts, many people say "any tighter and we could not breath."
Unfortunately, living during these tough times makes you more aware and concern towards the unfurtunate situations happening to everyone. We tend to focus more on our love ones and at the end of the day. the remains of breath is distributed to the rest of the world but everyting is taken very searious.

You hear alot of about the subprime mortage and the toxic assets whom everbody is trying to get rid of. In fact, Citibank is very clever when hiding their toxic assets and almost instantaneously became from zombie bank to profitable bank.
I call it a clever move, and may we all get out of the slump as quickly as possible. We all know now how quickly our stocks are worth less than a dollar one week and the next week we are woth almost five times more. Good news travel just as well as bad news or bad banking practices.

Bad banking practices is what we have experienced in Nicaragua. Specially my grandparents and their immediate family. By now you are aware of the Urcuyo vs. Citibank case
which is currently taking place in Nicaragua.
The case is looking very shady in to what appears to be bribes on behalf of the Citibank Nicaragua Operations. They have single handedly dedicated themselves to cover up the case against the we have against the bank in a less than professional manner. In fact, they have managed to ridicule the Nicaraguan court system by deniying that the are in fact Citibank from today and not the Citibank they were more than 30 years ago. They said it was another banking. It seems very primary to respond such ridicule answer while longing on the reputation of the name Citibank.
I urge you to contact the person in charge in Nicaragua as we demand our money and it is clear on what position everone must take.
We can and will resolve this in the most flawless manner as we would not like to continue with bad publicity or any. Later comes the propagation of information which has already started.
Now, more than ever it is time to demonstrate that Citibank is once again in Nicaragua and Latin America to help their citizens.
Everone has risk enough and i do not think they would like to fear to experience what we have from your actions from the past.Risking the simplest safekeeping of their money is not an option.
It must be a guarantee for everone.

I would like to share with you that the money than vanished from your bank more than 30 years ago, it belonged to my gradmother as most of the money deposited in the account was money she won in the Nicaraguan national loterry 2 months before the money dispappear from your vault.
Back then $75 K, is today close to half a million dollars or more.
I bet, if I was to ask people around the Nicaragua and Latin America, to whom they would turn to if they lost half a million dollars from their bank account.
Most already have answers since the Maddoff and sup prime chaos it created in wall street and mainstreet. We can make a more desperate scenerio also adding they would be thrown into exile in a whole new different environment and different country with new costumes not accostume to. It would be very meaningful to receive back your money.

At least, give it back after you realize from the overwhelming evidence against the bank.

One would expect a small sign of respect and dignity towards humanity.

You could find a couple of stories ranging from People ripped off from Maddoff, people who lost in the stock, people who have lost in the real state world.

There is nothing more gratifying to everyone than progress and good things to happening to everone around you but Citibank must accept the facts and respond like professionals and well educated people.
We brought overwhelming evidence against the bank and the bank could not present a single shred ofevidence, in fact, it brought in paid consultant from Harvard, may be not in the banks private jets but for sure first class.
Citibank has spent alot of money when they could have simply paid what they owe us a long time ago and we would all have gone on with our lives.

I could also be reached at luisurcuyo@hotmail.com


Thank You

Luis Urcuyo
http://luisurcuyo.blogpost.com/
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/product-compint-0001276671-page.html

This link will take you to the list of individuals responsible for Citibank in Nicaragua.
They will soon respond for the wrong decisions made by their previous executives in power.

Even though they are not the responsible persons for the mystery vanishing of my family's money more than 30 years ago, they are responsible for the current actions and posture they take on the Urcuyo vs. Citibank case currently in the Nicaraguan court system.

They have demonstrated to act irresponsibly and deny all claims we have made against their bank, they have also shown to side with the wrong side of the law bribing the judges in Nicaragua as well.

Citibank must accept their actions and wrongdoings and pay my family what we trusted in them to take care of, our money. It has been proven that they took my family's money and never returned it and NOW it is time to pay back.

to learn more simply go to http://luisurcuyo.blogspot.com/ or http://360.yahoo.com/luisurcuyo